Kvantinė laukų teorija ir Standartinis modelis

Quantum field theory and the Standard Model

The modern theory describing subatomic particles and their characteristic interactions

From particles to fields

Early quantum mechanics (1920s) treated particles as wave functions in potential wells, excellently explaining atomic structure but mainly focusing on one- or few-particle systems. Meanwhile, relativistic approaches revealed that high-energy processes could create or annihilate new particles (e.g., electron–positron pairs), contradicting non-relativistic wave formalism. In the 1930s–1940s, physicists realized the need to unify special relativity and quantum principles into a common framework where particles arise as excitations of fundamental fields. This laid the foundations of Quantum Field Theory (QFT).

In the QFT context, each particle type is a quantum excitation state of a certain field permeating space. For example, electrons are excitations of the “electron field,” photons of the “electromagnetic field,” and so on. Particle interactions reflect field interactions, usually described by a Lagrangian or Hamiltonian, and their characteristic symmetries determine gauge invariants. These gradual discoveries eventually formed the Standard Model – the crowning theory describing known fundamental particles (fermions) and forces (except gravity).

2. Fundamentals of Quantum Field Theory

2.1 “Second quantization” and particle formation

In conventional quantum mechanics, the wave function ψ(x, t) describes a system with a fixed number of particles. However, in the realm of relativistic energies, processes occur that create new particles or annihilate existing ones (e.g., electron–positron pair production). Quantum Field Theory (QFT) introduces the concept that fields are fundamental entities, and the number of particles is not constant. Fields become quantized:

  • Field operators: φ̂(x) or Ψ̂(x) – they can create/destroy particles at position x.
  • Fock space: A Hilbert space including states with a variable number of particles.

This allows for a systematic calculation of scattering phenomena in high-energy collisions based on perturbation theory, Feynman diagrams, and renormalization.

2.2 Gauge invariance

The essential principle is local gauge invariance: certain field transformations varying from point to point in spacetime do not change physical quantities. For example, electromagnetism arises from the U(1) gauge symmetry, while more complex gauge groups (e.g., SU(2) or SU(3)) describe the weak and strong interactions. This unifying approach defines interaction conditions (coupling constants), force carriers, and the structure of fundamental interactions.

2.3 Renormalization

Early attempts to develop QED (quantum electrodynamics) encountered infinite terms in perturbation expansions. Renormalization created a systematic method to handle these diverging expressions so that final physical quantities (electron mass, charge, etc.) are finite and observable. QED became one of the most precise physical theories, predicting experimentally confirmed values with extremely high accuracy (e.g., the electron's magnetic moment) [1,2].

3. Overview of the Standard Model

3.1 Particles: fermions and bosons

The Standard Model divides subatomic particles into two major categories:

  1. Fermions (spin ½):
    • Quarks: up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom, each having 3 "colors." Hadrons (e.g., protons, neutrons) are made from quarks.
    • Leptons: electron, muon, tau (with corresponding neutrino types). Neutrinos are extremely light particles interacting only weakly.
    Fermions obey the Pauli exclusion principle and are the fundamental building blocks of matter.
  2. Bosons (integer spin) – force carriers.
    • Gauge bosons: the photon (γ) for the electromagnetic force, W± and Z0 for the weak interaction, gluons (eight types) for the strong interaction.
    • Higgs boson: a scalar boson that gives mass to W and Z bosons and fermions through spontaneous symmetry breaking in the Higgs field.

The Standard Model describes three fundamental interactions: electromagnetic, weak, and strong (gravity is not yet included). The electromagnetic and weak forces unify into the electroweak theory, which spontaneously breaks into separate forces around the 100 GeV energy scale, producing the photon and W/Z bosons [3,4].

3.2 Quarks and confinement

Quarks have a color charge involved in the strong interaction, mediated by gluons. Due to color confinement, quarks generally cannot exist alone (individually) – they are "confined" within hadrons (mesons, baryons). Gluons themselves carry color, making the QCD (quantum chromodynamics) equation particularly ambiguous and nonlinear. High-energy collisions or heavy ion impacts can create a quark–gluon plasma, resembling the conditions of the early Universe.

3.3 Symmetry breaking: Higgs mechanism

The electroweak unification is based on the SU(2)L × U(1)Y group. Above ~100 GeV energy scale, the weak and electromagnetic interactions merge. The Higgs field acquires a nonzero vacuum expectation value, spontaneously breaking this symmetry, so the W± and Z0 bosons become massive, the photon remains massless. Fermion masses arise from Yukawa interactions with the Higgs field. The discovery of the Higgs boson (2012, LHC) confirmed this cornerstone of the Standard Model.

4. Standard Model predictions and success

4.1 Precision tests

Quantum electrodynamics (QED) – the electromagnetic part of the Standard Model – is perhaps the most precise physics theory (the electron magnetic moment matches measurements to 10-12 precision). Meanwhile, the accuracy of electroweak interactions was confirmed by LEP (CERN) and SLC (SLAC) experiments, which evaluated radiative corrections. QCD (quantum chromodynamics) also matches high-energy accelerator data if scale dependence and parton distribution functions are properly handled.

4.2 Particle discoveries

  • W and Z boson discovery (1983, CERN)
  • Top quark (1995, Fermilab)
  • Tau neutrino (2000)
  • Higgs boson (2012, LHC)

The masses and interactions of every discovered particle, measured experimentally, matched SM predictions or free parameters determined from other data. Overall, this provides a very reliable experimental foundation for the SM.

4.3 Neutrino oscillations

The initial version of the Standard Model considered neutrinos massless, but neutrino oscillation experiments (Super-Kamiokande, SNO) showed they have a small mass and can change flavor. This indicates new physics beyond the simplest SM. Commonly proposed solutions are right-handed neutrinos or the "seesaw" mechanism. However, this does not change the essence of the SM, only shows it is incomplete regarding neutrino mass.

5. Limits and unresolved questions

5.1 Without gravity

The Standard Model does not include gravity. Attempts to quantize gravity or unify it with other forces encounter difficulties. Studies in string theory, loop quantum gravity, etc., try to integrate the spin-2 graviton concept or emergent spacetime, but so far there is no unified theory combining the SM with gravity.

5.2 Dark matter and dark energy

Cosmic analysis shows that ~85% of matter is "dark matter," whose unknown particles are not predicted by the current SM: WIMPs, axions, or other hypothetical fields. Moreover, the Universe is expanding with acceleration, indicating "dark energy" – possibly a cosmological constant or a dynamic field not included in the SM. These phenomena show that although the SM is comprehensive, it does not complete the explanation of "everything."

5.3 Hierarchy and "fine-tuning" problems

Questions arise why the Higgs mass is so small compared to higher energies (the hierarchy problem), where the three particle family structure comes from, why CP violation is so fragile, what causes the strong interaction CP problem, etc. In the formal SM these questions fall into the domain of free parameters, but many theoretical physicists see this as indicating a deeper cause. Grand Unified Theories (GUT), supersymmetry, or other models have tried to address them but are not yet experimentally confirmed.

6. Modern accelerator experiments and future directions

6.1 Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

CERN's LHC, operating since 2008, collides protons up to 13–14 TeV energy, testing the Standard Model at high energies, searching for new particles (SUSY, additional measurements), studying Higgs properties, refining QCD/electroweak interaction limits. The LHC Higgs boson discovery (2012) was a huge step, but clear "beyond SM" signals have not yet been found.

6.2 Future facilities

Possible new generation accelerators:

  • High Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) – more data for rare reactions.
  • Future Circular Collider (FCC) or CEPC, possibly aiming for 100 TeV energy or a separate lepton collider for Higgs studies.
  • Neutrino projects (DUNE, Hyper-Kamiokande) – precise studies of transitions/scales.

They could show whether there really is a "desert" behind the SM energy or if there are still undiscovered phenomena.

6.3 Non-accelerator searches

Direct dark matter detection experiments (XENONnT, LZ, SuperCDMS), cosmic ray/gamma observations, extremely precise measurements of fundamental constants, or gravitational wave detections may also lead to scientific breakthroughs. The combination of collider and astrophysical data will be crucial to understand the limits of particle physics.

7. Philosophical and conceptual significance

7.1 Field-centric worldview

Quantum field theory surpasses the old "particle in empty space" concept – here fields are the fundamental reality, and particles are only excitations of those fields, also made up of vacuum vibrations, virtual processes, etc. Even the vacuum is not empty but full of zero-point energy and possible processes.

7.2 Reductionism and Unification

The Standard Model unifies electromagnetic and weak forces into the electroweak theory, taking a step toward a universal force unification. Many consider that at even higher energies there exist Grand Unified Theories (GUT) capable of uniting the strong interaction with the electroweak (e.g., SU(5), SO(10), or E6). So far, experimental confirmation of these theories has not been achieved, but the dream of a deeper unity of nature remains.

7.3 Ongoing Searches

Although the Standard Model successfully describes known phenomena, there remain "gaps," e.g., neutrinos, dark matter, gravity. Is there a more convenient explanation, for example, why such mass hierarchies exist, or what symmetry could unify even more interactions? Theoretical speculation, new experiments, and cosmic observations develop in parallel, so the coming decades may reveal a new stage of physics and expand or rewrite the mosaic of the Standard Model fields.

8. Conclusion

Quantum field theory and the Standard Model represent a remarkable achievement of 20th-century physicists, who combined quantum and relativistic principles into a coherent system capable of precisely describing subatomic particles and fundamental forces (strong, weak, electromagnetic). The concept of particles arises here from field excitations, so particle creation, antiparticles, quark confinement, and the Higgs mechanism become natural conclusions.

Despite questions arising about gravity, dark matter, dark energy, neutrino masses, and the hierarchy – indicating that the Standard Model is not "final" – ongoing LHC experiments, neutrino research centers, cosmic observations, and (possibly) future accelerators should help transcend the "boundaries of the Standard Model." So far, the Standard Model remains the foundation of our understanding of the microcosm – evidence that we can reveal the subtle structure of fields, matter, and forces that determine the observable structure of the Universe.

References and further reading

  1. Peskin, M. E., & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press.
  2. Weinberg, S. (1995). The Quantum Theory of Fields (3 volumes). Cambridge University Press.
  3. Glashow, S. L., Iliopoulos, J., & Maiani, L. (1970). “Weak interactions with lepton–hadron symmetry.” Physical Review D, 2, 1285.
  4. ’t Hooft, G. (1971). “Renormalizable Lagrangians for Massive Yang–Mills Fields.” Nuclear Physics B, 35, 167–188.
  5. Zee, A. (2010). Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell, 2nd edition. Princeton University Press.
  6. Patrignani, C., & Particle Data Group (2017). “Review of Particle Physics.” Chinese Physics C, 40, 100001.
Return to the blog