Visuomenės Požiūriai ir Parama - www.Kristalai.eu

Public Attitudes and Support

Society's attitude and support: Valuing diversity of intelligences, cultural influence on education, and equal learning opportunities

Every society – whether a small local community or a huge global city – has both explicit and implicit beliefs about what it means to be "smart." These beliefs determine how children are raised, how achievements are evaluated in schools, how employers choose, and how state funds are allocated. When society respects diversity of intelligences and ensures it with fair resources, both individuals and communities thrive. But when understanding narrows, untapped talents fade, and opportunity gaps deepen.

Contents

  1. 1. Why society's attitude towards intelligence matters
  2. 2. Valuing diversity of intelligences
  3. 3. Education systems and cultural influence
  4. 4. Access to Education and Equal Opportunities
  5. 5. Policy and Community Initiatives
  6. 6. Examples from five continents
  7. 7. Success assessment without standardized tests
  8. 8. Future directions and key insights

1. Why society's attitude towards intelligence matters

Cognitive sciences show that neuroplasticity – the brain's ability to change and grow – remains even in adulthood. However, whether these abilities develop largely depends on the social ecosystem. Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck's research on "growth and fixed mindsets" showed that children who believe intelligence can grow persist more in solving challenges and achieve more.[1] Meanwhile, stereotypes (e.g., "girls can't learn science," "rural youth are uncreative") lead to weaker results due to self-fulfilling prophecies.

Societal attitudes determine:

  • Public investments – countries that view education as a public good invest more in early education and have higher adult literacy rates.[2]
  • Curriculum content – which skills are developed (memorizing calculations or creatively solving problems) reflect cultural values.
  • Selection mechanisms – standardized exams, apprenticeships, portfolios, or community recommendations emphasize different cognitive strengths.

2. Valuing diversity of intelligences

2.1 Theory of multiple intelligences

Harvard professor Howard Gardner proposed eight (now often nine) types of intelligence – linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic, and existential.[3] Critics note a lack of psychometric basis, but the theory has spurred a movement toward strengths-based education.

2.2 Neurodiversity and societal value

The neurodiversity perspective sees autism, ADHD, and dyslexia not as "disorders" but as cognitive variations with unique strengths. IT company SAP now hires autistic "pattern recognizers" for software testing, increasing defect detection rates by 30%.[4]

2.3 Understanding genius in different cultures

  • Confucian East Asia values persistent effort – even students with modest talents earn respect through hard study.
  • African Ubuntu views intelligence as communal problem-solving – success is measured by benefit to the group, not individual achievements.[5]
  • Silicon Valley values creativity and risk – failure is seen as data, not a mistake.[6]

2.4 Recognition of informal learning

Young people repairing motorcycles in Lagos demonstrate spatial and mechanical intelligence, which is rarely measured in school. Platforms like Badgr issue "micro-credentials" for community-recognized skills, expanding employment opportunities.

3. Education systems and cultural influence

3.1 Explicit and hidden curriculum

Although schedules show algebra and grammar, the "hidden curriculum" teaches punctuality, obedience, or debate – depending on the culture. In Japan, group harmony is emphasized through tokkatsu (joint activities), while US schools encourage personal expression through discussions.

3.2 High-stakes tests and holistic models

Gaokao in China determines life paths—nine-hour exams emphasize speed and memory. Finland, by contrast, delays testing until age 16 and focuses on phenomenon-based learning, which is linked to high PISA scores and low anxiety levels.[7]

3.3 Teacher Expectations and the Pygmalion Effect

A classic study showed that randomly “labeled” students raised IQ scores simply due to higher teacher expectations.[8] Current research finds a similar effect on math and STEM achievement, especially in marginalized groups.

3.4 Cultural Influence on Pedagogy

  • Power Distance: In cultures with high power distance, students may hesitate to question teachers, which suppresses inquiry-based learning.
  • Uncertainty Avoidance: Programs may emphasize strict rules or open projects.

4. Access to Education and Equal Opportunities

4.1 Social and Economic Disparities

The World Bank estimates that 244 million children do not attend school, mostly in poor regions or conflict zones.[9] Even in wealthy countries, funding often depends on property taxes, creating resource deserts—places lacking libraries, labs, or counselors.

4.2 Digital Divide

During the COVID-19 lockdown, 463 million students lacked access to remote learning.[10] Solutions: community Wi‑Fi centers, free educational websites, affordable solar-powered tablets.

4.3 Language Barriers

Only 2% of internet content worldwide is available in the languages spoken by 50% of the world's people.[11] Open Educational Resources (OER) are now translating math and science courses into Swahili, Urdu, and Quechua.

4.4 Gender and Disability Inclusion

  • Girls' Education: Each additional year of secondary school increases future earnings by 15–25% and halves the number of early marriages.[12]
  • Universal Design Education: Video subtitles and tactile graphics facilitate access for the deaf and blind, but benefit everyone.

5. Policy and Community Initiatives

5.1 Investments in early childhood

Economist James Heckman's analyses show that every dollar invested in quality early childhood education for socially vulnerable children returns 7–9 dollars.[13]

5.2 Universal Design for Learning (UDL)

UDL principles promote including diverse forms of engagement, representation, and expression to suit hearing, seeing, and moving learners.

5.3 Community learning centers

Nairobi's iHub and Detroit's Brightmoor neighborhood workshops offer mentorship, 3D printers, and microgrants, fostering entrepreneurial intelligence in informal settings.

5.4 Conditional cash transfers (CCT)

Brazil's "Bolsa Família" program links subsidies to school attendance, encouraging attendance and reducing child labor.[14]

5.5 Teacher professional development

In Singapore, the implementation of "lesson study" encourages joint planning and reflects Confucian self-cultivation, enhancing pedagogical competence.

6. Examples from five continents

6.1 Finland: comprehensive schools and trust-based accountability

No national exams until age 16; teachers require a master's degree and have high autonomy. Result: high PISA scores, low child stress, and minimal achievement gaps.

6.2 Kenya: mobile learning and community radio

The ELIMU project broadcasts math lessons on the radio and distributes SIM-based quizzes; literacy levels in pilot regions increased by 12% in one year.

6.3 USA: promoting neurodiversity in the IT sector

SAP, Microsoft, and Dell run "Autism at Work" programs. Employee retention is higher, and team innovations are more pronounced, proving the business benefits of diverse thinking.

6.4 India: bridge schools for migrant children

The non-governmental organization Aide et Action establishes seasonal schools near workplaces, helping children avoid missing school due to family migration.

6.5 Chile: the early reading revolution

State-supported “Bibliotecas CRA” equip rural libraries and train parents as reading coaches – reducing urban-rural literacy gaps by 8%.

7. Success assessment without standardized tests

  • Portfolio assessment: Projects, experiments, and reflection journals are assessed in Finland and New Zealand.
  • Social-emotional indicators: Chicago schools track the “5 essentials” (trust, safety, support, challenge, leadership).
  • Community impact scores: Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness index includes cultural preservation and ecological responsibility.

OECD 2024 Beyond Academic Learning report urges countries to measure creativity, resilience, and digital literacy.

8. Future directions and key insights

8.1 AI-powered personalization

Adaptive learning solutions, e.g., Smart Sparrow, change difficulty level and delivery style in real time – but continuous checks are necessary to ensure recommendations are fair for all.

8.2 Global qualification portability

UNESCO-developed “learning passports,” based on blockchain, allow refugees to prove their skills even after losing paper documents.

Key insights

  • Diversity of intellects is real and valuable – societies thrive when nurturing the full spectrum of cognitive strengths.
  • Culture shapes education – conscious alignment of pedagogy and local values increases engagement.
  • Equal opportunities require resources – reducing digital, gender, and disability gaps strengthens the entire economy.
  • Indicators change behavior – measuring creativity, collaboration, and well-being guides policy toward holistic success.

Disclaimer: This is an educational article and is not legal, medical, or investment advice.

Selected literature used

  1. Dweck C. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House; 2006.
  2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. "Global Education Monitoring Report 2024."
  3. Gardner H. Frames of Mind. Basic Books; 1983.
  4. Austin R & Pisano G. “Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage.” Harvard Business Review; 2017.
  5. Nsamenang A. B. “Human Development in Cultural Context: A Third World Perspective.” Sage; 1992.
  6. Lee M. K. “Fail Fast – Fail Often: Cultural Schemas in Silicon Valley.” California Management Review; 2020.
  7. Sahlberg P. Finnish Lessons 3.0. Teachers College Press; 2021.
  8. Rosenthal R, Jacobson L. “Pygmalion in the Classroom.” Urban Review; 1968.
  9. World Bank. State of Global Learning Poverty 2023.
  10. UNICEF. “COVID‑19 and Remote Learning.” Policy Brief, 2022.
  11. W3Techs. “Web Content Languages Usage Trends.” 2024.
  12. UNICEF. The Investment Case for Girls’ Education. 2023.
  13. Heckman J. “Skill Formation and Investments in Disadvantaged Children.” Science; 2006.
  14. Fiszbein A & Schady N. Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty. World Bank; 2009.
  15. OECD. Beyond Academic Learning: PISA 2024 Framework. 2024.

     

     ← Previous article                    Next topic→

     

     

    To the beginning

    Return to the blog