Mitybos mokslas

Nutrition science

Nutrition science has undergone significant advances in the past few years, moving from general dietary guidelines to personalized approaches. Two prominent areas in this evolutionary stage are personalized nutrition—dietary approaches tailored to an individual’s genetics—and functional foods designed to deliver specific health benefits. This article discusses these innovative areas, highlighting their scientific basis, current applications, and potential implications for health and well-being.

Personalized nutrition: diets tailored to a person's genetics

Understanding personalized nutrition

Personalized nutrition, also known as nutrigenomics, refers to the tailoring of dietary recommendations based on an individual's genetic profile. This approach recognizes that genetic differences can influence how people respond to various nutritional components, affecting metabolism, nutrient absorption, and disease risk.

The role of genetics in nutrition

  • Genetic differences (SNPs): Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are common genetic differences that can affect nutrient processing. For example, variations in the MTHFR gene can affect folate metabolism.
  • Interaction between genes and diet: Genes can interact with dietary factors to influence health outcomes. For example, individuals with certain variants of the APOE gene may respond differently to dietary fat, which affects cholesterol levels.

Areas of application of personalized nutrition

  • Disease prevention and treatment
    • Cardiovascular health: Tailoring diets based on genetic profile can optimize lipid levels and reduce the risk of heart disease.
    • Weight control: Genetic testing can identify a predisposition to obesity and help select appropriate interventions for weight loss.
  • Nutrient metabolism
    • Lactose intolerance: Genetic testing can confirm whether a person retains milk sugar digestion (lactase activity) or not, and guide the consumption of dairy products accordingly.
    • Caffeine metabolism: Variants in the CYP1A2 gene affect caffeine metabolism, which may shape recommendations for caffeine consumption.
  • Scientific evidence and research
    • Clinical trials: Randomized controlled observational studies have shown that personalized dietary advice based on genetic information leads to greater dietary changes than standard guidelines.
    • Research shows: Nutrigenomics interventions may improve glucose control in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
  • Technological progress
    • High-throughput genotyping: Advanced genetic testing technologies have made genetic testing more accessible and cost-effective.
    • Bioinformatics tools: Improved computational methodologies allow for better interpretation of genetic data in the context of nutrition.
  • Challenges and considerations
    • Ethics and privacy issues:
      • Data security: It is very important to protect genetic information from unauthorized access.
      • Informed consent: Individuals need to understand the implications of genetic testing.
    • Limitations of science:
      • Incomplete knowledge base: The complexity of gene-diet interactions means that our understanding is constantly evolving.
      • Differences in responses: Not all individuals with the same genetic variant will respond identically to nutritional interventions.

Functional foods: products designed to provide specific health benefits

Definition of functional foods

Functional foods are products that provide health benefits beyond their basic nutritional value due to the presence of bioactive compounds. These can be fortified foods, probiotics, or foods naturally rich in beneficial substances.

Categories of functional foods

  • Enriched products: Foods that are fortified with additional nutrients, such as vitamin D-fortified milk.
  • Probiotics and prebiotics: Live microbial cultures and indigestible fiber to promote intestinal health.
  • Phytochemicals: Plant-derived compounds, such as flavonoids and carotenoids, have antioxidant properties.

Health benefits of functional foods

  • Cardiovascular health
    • Omega-3 fatty acids: Found in fat-rich fish products, omega-3s can reduce inflammation and lower the risk of heart disease.
    • Sterol-enriched products: Plant sterols can reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels.
  • Digestive system
    • Probiotics: Yogurt with live cultures can improve the balance of intestinal microflora and reduce gastrointestinal problems.
    • Dietary fiber: Whole grains and nut products promote bowel regularity and may reduce the risk of colon cancer.
  • Immune system
    • Antioxidant-rich foods: Berries, nuts, and green tea contain antioxidants that protect cells from oxidative stress.

Scientific evidence and research

  • Clinical trials:
    A meta-analysis showed that consuming oat beta-glucans can significantly reduce cholesterol levels.
    Studies show that probiotics can reduce the duration and severity of common respiratory infections.
  • Regulatory approvals:
    Health claims about the benefits of functional foods are evaluated and approved by agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) based on scientific evidence.
  • Development and innovation
    • Food technology:
      • Encapsulation techniques: To preserve bioactive substances during processing and digestion to enhance their effectiveness.
      • Genetic modification: Crops with improved nutritional value are being developed, such as golden rice enriched with beta-carotene.
    • Customized functional products:
      By combining personalized nutrition with functional foods, personalized dietary solutions are created.

Challenges and considerations

  • Scientifically validated questions
    • Quality of evidence: Not all functional foods have strong clinical evidence to support their health benefits.
  • Consumer perception
    • Marking and education: Clear labeling is essential to allow consumers to make informed decisions.
  • Regulatory obstacles
    • Standardization: Different regulations in different countries can complicate the marketing and distribution of functional food products.

Advances in nutritional science are paving the way for personalized and functional dietary and health approaches. Personalized nutrition leverages genetic information to tailor nutritional recommendations, potentially improving health outcomes and disease management. Functional foods provide specific health benefits that go beyond basic nutritional value, contributing to the prevention and treatment of various health conditions.

While these areas hold great potential, challenges such as ethical issues, scientific limitations and regulatory challenges need to be addressed. Continued research and collaboration between scientists, healthcare professionals, industry and policymakers are essential to unlock the full potential of personalized nutrition and functional foods.

References

  1. Ferguson, LR (2014). Nutrigenomics approaches to functional foods. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 28(sup4), 439S-446S.
  2. Ordov, JM, & Mooser, V. (2004). Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics. Current Opinion in Lipidology, 15(2), 101-108.
  3. Bailey, LB, & Gregory, JF (1999). Folate metabolism and requirements. The Journal of Nutrition, 129(4), 779-782.
  4. Corella, D., & Ordovas, JM (2014). Biomarkers: background, classification and guidelines for applications in nutritional epidemiology. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 24(7), 694-704.
  5. Phillips, CM (2013). Nutrigenetics and metabolic disease: current status and implications for personalized nutrition. Nutrients, 5(1), 32-57.
  6. Arkadianos, I., et al. (2007). Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a calorie controlled diet. Nutrition Journal, 6(1), 29.
  7. Enattah, NS, et al. (2002). Identification of a variant associated with adult-type hypolactasia. Nature Genetics, 30(2), 233-237.
  8. Cornelis, MC, et al. (2006). Coffee, CYP1A2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA, 295(10), 1135-1141.
  9. Nielsen, DE, & El-Sohemy, A. (2012). A randomized trial of genetic information for personalized nutrition. Genes & Nutrition, 7(4), 559-566.
  10. de Roos, B., & Brennan, L. (2017). Personalized interventions—a precision approach for the next generation of dietary intervention studies. Nutrients, 9(8), 847.
  11. Shendure, J., & Ji, H. (2008). Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnology, 26(10), 1135-1145.
  12. Kaput, J., et al. (2010). The case for strategic international alliances to harness nutritional genomics for public and personal health. The British Journal of Nutrition, 104(10), 1676-1683.
  13. Middleton, A., et al. (2015). Global public perceptions of genomic data sharing: what shapes the willingness to donate DNA and health data? The American Journal of Human Genetics, 98(1), 1-6.
  14. McGuire, AL, & Beskow, LM (2010). Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 11, 361-381.
  15. Ordov, JM (2016). The promise of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics. Physiological Genomics, 48(12), 957-961.
  16. Zeevi, D., et al. (2015). Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell, 163(5), 1079-1094.
  17. Martirosyan, DM, & Singh, J. (2015). A new definition of functional food by FFC: what makes a new definition unique? Functional Foods in Health and Disease, 5(6), 209-223.
  18. Calvo, MS, et al. (2004). Vitamin D fortification in the United States and Canada: current status and data needs. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 80(6), 1710S-1716S.
  19. Hill, C., et al. (2014). Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 11(8), 506-514.
  20. Liu, RH (2013). Dietary bioactive compounds and their health implications. Journal of Food Science, 78, A18-A25.
  21. Calder, PC (2012). Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: nutrition or pharmacology? British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 75(3), 645-662.
  22. Demonty, I., et al. (2009). Continuous dose-response relationship of the LDL-cholesterol–lowering effect of phytosterol intake. The Journal of Nutrition, 139(2), 271-284.
  23. Sanders, ME, et al. (2013). Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: from biology to the clinic. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 10(9), 605-614.
  24. Anderson, JW, et al. (2009). Health benefits of dietary fiber. Nutrition Reviews, 67(4), 188-205.
  25. Li, Y., et al. (2014). Antioxidant activity and mechanism of protocatechuic acid in vitro. Functional Foods in Health and Disease, 4(11), 416-423.
  26. Whitehead, A., et al. (2014). Cholesterol-lowering effects of oat β-glucan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(6), 1413-1421.
  27. Hao, Q. et al. (2015). Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), CD006895.
  28. US Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Label Claims for Conventional Foods and Dietary Supplements. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov
  29. Augustin, MA, & Sanguansri, L. (2015). Challenges and solutions to incorporating functional lipids into foods. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 6, 463-477.
  30. Tang, G., et al. (2009). Golden rice is an effective source of vitamin A. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(6), 1776-1783.
  31. Blumberg, J., et al. (2010). Impact of genetics on nutrient status. Advances in Nutrition, 1(4), 464-471.
  32. Toribio-Mateas, M. (2018). Harnessing the power of microbiome assessment tools as part of neuroprotective nutrition and lifestyle medicine interventions. Microorganisms, 6(2), 35.
  33. van Kleef, E., et al. (2005). Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 16(3), 181-201.
  34. Granato, D., et al. (2010). Functional foods and nondairy probiotic food development: trends, concepts, and products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 9(3), 292-302.

← Previous article Next article →

Back to top

Return to the blog